Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Some fragrances impress you with the coherence of the entire package in which they arrive: the name, the colour of the juice, the bottle, the poster… they all interlock into a convincing whole. Sadly, Bang, the new masculine from Marc Jacobs, isn’t one such scent, which is a shame, because it actually smells rather good, albeit for a few, brief minutes. In a mainstream market where Chanel think it’s acceptable to release Bleu, it is gratifying to find a male eau de toilette that doesn’t seem intent on being indistinguishable from every other citrus clone. Its peppery opening deserves praise, as do its woody mid-notes, with their scalpel-thin sprinklings of cedar. But just as you start getting really excited, the whole lot fades away into the pale distance and is entirely gone within a couple of hours. So even though the flacon, the name and the advertising campaign are all noteworthy in their own way, they seem designed for an entirely different scent, because no matter how pleasant it may be, this fragrance certainly isn’t powerful enough to be named after bangs of any sort… unless, of course, you’re talking about the quick, ‘wham bam, thank you, maam’ variety.

[Review based on a sample of eau de toilette obtained in 2010; fragrance tested on skin]

Persolaise.


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thought on “Review: Bang by Marc Jacobs (2010)”
  1. I've foudn that with a few mainstream scents lately. Even if they have great ideas, good ingredients, pleasant openings… they fade away and have no sillage. I think the marketers insist on it, thinking that the public can't handle strong perfumes.

  2. kjanicki, you may well be right. I wouldn't say that the ideas in Bang are necessarily great, but yes, the scent does feel as though it was stifled by a focus group.

  3. I felt quite a lot like you. An interesting opening and then, fades to nothing. On paper it was even more interesting to me and I felt quite excited at first, thinking that perhaps finally we had a mainstream fragrance that was slightly different and more original. I still think it is one of the better releases of the year, but lacking 'guts'.

I love hearing from my readers, so please feel free to write a comment or ask a question.