Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tom Ford Tuscan Leather Intense perfume review, critic Persolaise, 2019, Miller Harris Leather Rouge

The bandwagon of intensity keeps finding room for more passengers. The latest arrival: Mr Tom Ford. Not that he’s a stranger to its relentless progress, mind. He’s already got Oud Wood Intense and Tobacco Oud Intense in his line-up. And now the range is extended with Tuscan Leather Intense, although I can’t help feeling the addition is somewhat belated. As TL is, in many ways, the quintessential Ford fragrance, I would’ve thought it would have been the first to receive the intensification treatment. But who knows? Perhaps it took a while for its formula to be finalised.

Anyway, it’s with us now, and like the original incarnation, it is a scent that kicks up a storm. Almost literally. One sniff is enough to make you picture hooves hitting a parched desert floor, the loud impact sending clouds of dust exploding into the air, causing tremors to ripple across the sun-blistered landscape.

I’ve long been fond of Tuscan Leather. As an updated Knize Ten, it’s succeeded in convincing critics and buyers that there will always be room for strident, bitter leather notes, topped by a sour strawberry-raspberry accord, and tailed by a well-judged cocktail of musks and woods. It’s a structure that just works. And seems to withstand the test of time.

The Intense version doesn’t mess with the basic idea, thankfully. But – as was the case with the new iteration of Dior Joy – I’m not sure I’d call it ‘intense’. Although I realise not many people get worked up about semantics quite as much as I do. As far as I’m aware, ‘intense’ implies a greater level of concentration, a more frenzied pitch, a heightened level of tension; after all, the word comes from the Latin ‘intensus’, meaning ‘tightly stretched’. But if anything, this new Tuscan Leather is deeper. It sinks further into the vistas it conjures. The fruit note is less glaring, less sickly. The leathers are far darker. And the base pulls you in much more strongly, with a hint of the black hole magnetism that makes scents like Vero Profumo Onda so compelling. The hooves are still thumping, but they’re heavier. And perhaps slower. Or maybe ‘in slow motion’ would be a more apt description. Either way, they make a gorgeous sound.

Tuscan Leather popped up the other day in the new Miller Harris Leather Rouge (perfumer: Mathieu Nardin), by which I mean that the latter bears more than a passing resemblance to the former. Originality is a contentious issue in perfumery, a fact about which I’m sure I’ve written in the past. With thousands of scents released every year, it is becoming increasingly difficult to a) create something truly original and b) smell enough perfumes so that you can spot clones of scents that have come before. Those unaware of Tom Ford’s output, or indeed Knize Ten, may no doubt consider Leather Rouge to be a marvel. But those of us who’ve enjoyed the delights of Tuscan Leather for years won’t be able to resist a comparison between the two. I’d suggest the Miller Harris is more overtly ‘Arabian’ – the saffron note feels more pronounced – and it displays less tenacity. But essentially, the two are very close siblings.

[Tom Ford Tuscan Leather Intense review and Miller Harris Leather Rouge review based on samples of eau de parfum provided by the respective brands in 2019.]

Persolaise


If you’ve enjoyed this post, please consider supporting my work
by ‘buying me a coffee’ using the panel below.

Thanks very much indeed.


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I love hearing from my readers, so please feel free to write a comment or ask a question.